Nine output layers. One mode-correct document of record.
The platform produces layered outputs serving different decisions: internal quality records, external research artefacts, a mode-specific conclusion, and the institutional Word file. Program admission, M&A, IPO readiness, IPO review and listed-company research do not borrow investment-committee language from one another.
Internal analytical foundation. These outputs are produced during Workflows 2–4 and are not normally circulated to the committee.
Output layers overview
Internal Criteria Score Table
Score plus evidence trail across 50 modules × 20 criteria. Functions as an internal quality report.
Internal · Workflow 2
Contradiction / Risk-Signal Map
Internal map of risks and verification needs. Summarised in the committee memo; the raw version stays internal.
Internal · Workflow 3
External Research Query Set
Repeatable, auditable query set copied into external research tools. Links are mandatory.
Tooling · Workflow 4
What reaches the decision owner or research reader. The selected mode determines whether this is a decision note, admission view, transaction view, readiness review, offering review or listed-company research note.
Final Decision Note
Mode-specific conclusion with a 0–100 score and label where applicable. Listed-company research instead carries cut-off-dated market-cap, enterprise-value and NAV/SOTP bridges, thesis, counter-thesis and evidence confidence.
Committee · Workflow 9
Decision Package
Pre-read items, critical discussion questions and the post-review action set where the mode requires a committee package. Research modes use their own evidence and monitoring registers instead.
Committee · Workflow 10
Decision / Research Memo
A concise, mode-correct memo for rapid distribution to the decision owner or research reader.
Committee · Workflow 11
Record-of-decision artefacts. Final Word-ready text, additional DD requests and the archival .docx — produced under Workflows 12–14.
Word-Ready Text
Executive committee report text ready to paste into Word; passed through a final language-quality pass.
Delivery · Workflow 12
DD Request List
Additional information and document requests gathered in one pass. Internal use; optionally packaged for delivery to the founder.
Optional · Workflow 13
Institutional Word File
Final .docx ready for institutional review. Technical markers removed; compliant with the mode-specific content and document standard.
Delivery · Workflow 14
Four evidence bands. Mode-specific language. No context leakage.
Seven scored modes resolve through four ordered evidence bands, but their wording follows the active decision: investment, campaign, program admission, transaction suitability, IPO readiness or IPO review. Listed-company research is scoreless and concludes with a thesis, counter-thesis and evidence limits.
Direct, mode-correct conclusion
High score, clear rationale and a solid evidence chain. The conclusion may support investment review, program admission or transaction suitability only in the language of the active mode.
Progress with explicit conditions
The evidence points toward progression, but material conditions, integration work, support needs or verification items remain visible and owned.
Cannot yet conclude
The evidence chain is incomplete. The output names the exact files, external verification or structural information that could change the mode-specific view.
Weak present view at item level
Low score, dense risk signals or a binding gate. The rationale is concrete and does not convert a weak program, transaction or offering view into generic investment language.
Six rules govern the final delivery.
Heading hierarchy
Standard mappings [H1] = Heading 1, [H2] = Heading 2, [H3] = Heading 3 are preserved through the conversion.
Bullet markers
Converted to native list structures; no tables are created where the source has none.
Link discipline
URLs appear only in the references section; not carried into the main body.
Technical-marker cleanup
Markers such as [H1] or [PAGE_BREAK] do not appear in the final document. Internal process, tools and methodology are not disclosed.
Institutional appearance
No excessive emphasis, coloured formatting or decorative elements. Premium but restrained.
File naming convention
Investment_Committee_Decision_Support_Note_[PROJECT]_[DATE].docx — file-safe characters preferred over diacritics.